Build the bench sheet
Bring the question presented, key facts, case citations, record locations, and main themes into one glanceable structure.
Prepare the argument ↗
See the system
A live bench sheet for appellate counsel
argue ready keeps the question presented, standard of review, authorities, record cites, and requested relief within reach while you answer the panel.
Opening themeWhy our client should prevail.
A private layer for the live argument.
The system
Build a compact board from the materials you already know: the question presented, standard of review, record, authorities, key themes, weak points, and relief.
Bring the question presented, key facts, case citations, record locations, and main themes into one glanceable structure.
Prepare the argument ↗Keep concise responses to weak points, likely questions, and the arguments you may need when the bench moves.
Rehearse the hard points ↗Preserve your place after an interruption, then come back to the next point without rebuilding the argument from memory.
Find the return path ↗The point is not another script. It’s keeping the question, answer, and record within reach.
— the argue ready principle
For oral argument
The hard part is not repeating the brief. It is conversing with the panel while keeping your theory, record, and path to relief within reach.
Start with the proposition the court must understand. Then give the argument a structure that can survive interruption.
Built for the courtroom
argue ready retrieves the prepared material you need to answer questions—case law, record cites, themes, weak points, and the path to relief—without trying to make strategy for you.
See the workflow ↗For counsel and teams
No. It tracks prepared requirements and retrieves counsel’s own notes, authorities, and record cites. The lawyer remains in control of the argument and the strategy.
The system can surface the prepared response or context card, then preserve the place in the main argument so counsel can return to the next unfinished obligation.
That is the intended workflow: compact, glanceable cards for the authorities, record references, and “do not concede” notes the team prepared before argument.
No. The core experience is designed to surface prepared material while counsel speaks. It does not need to listen to or record the courtroom to track the argument.
There is no recording archive in the core workflow because no recording is created by default. Storage and retention should remain explicit choices for each team and deployment.
Recording should be an intentional, optional workflow—not something that happens silently. If enabled for a deployment, counsel should start and stop it deliberately and follow applicable court rules and consent requirements.
Not by default. argue ready’s core view is a live map of obligations, authorities, record cites, and return points—not a verbatim transcript. A transcript can be an optional source when a connected transcription workflow is enabled.
Use argue ready with prepared material only, add manual notes, or connect separate recording and transcription workflows where your team needs them. You decide what is captured, what is stored, and who can access it.